|
On
the Issues > Death Penalty>
Justice
and the Death Penalty
by Kelly Grotke
Justice
Thurgood Marshall believed in the power of well-reasoned, informed
argument to combat the regressive forces of ignorance and blind
assertion. And he also knew that ensuring justice and fairness was
no easy matter, and that the road up from barbarism was indeed a
long one. He was an NAACP lawyer in the South during the 1950's,
after all. When the Supreme Court halted capital punishment nationwide
in 1972 (Furman v. Georgia, 408 US 238), he wrote that, "assuming
all knowledge of the facts presently available regarding capital
punishment, the average citizen would, in my opinion, find it shocking
to his conscience and sense of justice. For this reason alone, capital
punishment cannot stand."
So how far have we traveled in the 28 years since then? Illinois
has a moratorium, thanks to Gov. Ryan. That was the right thing
to do, and it is to Ryan's credit as a supporter of the death penalty
that he recognizes the magnitude of the abuses. But we've still
got a long way to go, and what's worse, we've been here before.
First, there is the question of whether innocent people have been
executed. Fifty-seven percent of Texans think so. Gov. Bush claims
he is "confident…that people who have been put to death have
been guilty of the crime charged and have had full access to the
courts." Yet the MacArthur Justice Center has chronicled several
cases of possible wrongful executions, some in Texas. The recent
execution of Gary Graham brought this problem to national attention.
There is also the issue of access to adequate legal representation.
Federal funding for defense of the poor in capital cases was absolutely
gutted in the mid-90's. And in Alabama, for example, defense lawyers
are paid by law only $1,000 for out-of-court expenses, $600 for
postconviction proceedings, and often have no experience with capital
cases (the intricate habeas corpus regulations make this, frankly,
a matter of life and death). That a defense lawyer might fall asleep,
be intoxicated, or be otherwise incompetent or incapable of presenting
an adequate defense is apparently not perceived to be a problem
in a number of states. The Columbia University study run by Prof.
James Liebman showed that two-thirds of capital convictions were
overturned on appeal for issues ranging from incompetent defense
lawyers to prosecutorial misconduct. It didn't answer the question
of whether innocent people have already been put to death (that
wasn't the aim of the study), but it does give reason for very serious
concern about the current state of capital punishment.
Then there is the issue of racial or other bias, which was also
considered in 1972. The Justice Department is studying this now
in federal cases, where 17 of the 21 federal death row inmates are
minorities. As Justice Douglas wrote in the Furman case, "it
would seem to be incontestable that the death penalty inflicted
on one defendant is 'unusual' if it discriminates against him by
reason of his race, religion, wealth, social position or class,
or if it imposed under a procedure that gives room for the play
of such prejudices." In other words, it would violate the Eighth
Amendment of the Constitution. And there is politics. Support for
the death penalty is still strong. Bush and Gore are both supporters
of the death penalty. Bush, who mocked Carla Faye Tucker's plea
for clemency in a magazine interview, seems a lost cause. He refuses
to face the real and abhorrent ugliness exhibited again and again
by the capital punishment system, which makes his self-proclaimed
"compassion" hypocritical at best. Gore says he is concerned
about wrongful convictions, but hasn't gone further than that yet,
despite efforts by a number of Democrats (including Reps. Jackson
& Schakowsky) to pass legislation addressing some of the current
abuses and despite the American Bar Association's call for a national
moratorium on the basis of "gross injustice" in the application
of the death penalty. The NAACP also wants a moratorium. It has
been, and continues to be, a long, hard road. Marshall thought that
ignorance of the facts necessary for making informed judgments explained
popular support for the death penalty. I hope he was right, since
that would be easier to address than indifference.
©
Copyright 2001-2003 Democratic Party of Evanston
826 Custer Street, Evanston, IL 60202
ph 847.491.0865 Developed by Palantir.net
|